Friday, 3 April 2009

Second Draft Indp Study

Jaspreet Dhillon
“You know me I don’t really believe in marriage; now botox on the other hand works everytime”[1]Do representations of females in Sex and the City: The movie differ from representations of females in previous media texts? If so, how? And why?

In past media text women have been portrayed as passive and their sole purpose on screen is for the male audience’s sexual excitement. Following the hit series ‘Sex and the City’, HBO has also brought us Sex and the City: The movie. The characters Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte and Miranda have ‘sexual freedom, opportunity and the ability to be successful’[2]. So how does ‘Sex and the City’s’ representation of women differ to women that were once represented as inferior to men, naive and ‘symbolically annihilated’[3] from the media? Due to the Second Word War, feminism, the arrival of the contraceptive pill and many acts such as 1969 Divorce Act, women’s role in society has changed drastically. As a result the representation of women in media texts has also changed.

The character of Carrie carries the narration throughout the movie, this subverts the Mulveyian view of audiences being “encouraged to identify with the protagonist of the film who tended to be a man”[4], as audiences here are forced to relate with a female. This results in Carrie being represented as more dominant and female audiences will therefore want to identify with her. This differs from bond films in which the “bond girls” are either “mere eye candy”[5] or a “damsel in distress”[6] and have “no direct involvement in bonds mission”[7]. The women are represented as weak whereas the opening female narration instantly gives an authoritative representation of females in Sex and the City. ‘The role of women in a film almost always revolves around her physical appearance’[8]

The 1960’s arrival of the contraceptive pill allowed society’s women to have “unprecedented control over their fertility.”[9] This resulted in women freely having sex which had a serious impact on traditional gender roles as “women did not have to choose between a relationship and a career”.[10] The character of Samantha is represented as a stereotypical “blonde bimbo” with an extremely high sex drive. “Samantha loves sex, lots of sex”[11]. This portrayal has been possible due to “the pill”. Historically, for a women to speak freely about sex was frowned upon and seen as a taboo however the characters of Sex and the City subvert this and happily “discuss every kind of sex, masturbation, dildos, telephone sex and blowjobs”[12] whilst having lunch. Samantha says “I met a guy with the funkiest tasting spunk”[13] and also lies naked on the kitchen table with sushi over her body waiting for her boyfriend to come home. In the past women would have been punished for expressing such sexual views where as men would be praised however these gender roles have been reversed in ‘Sex and the City’.

As well as being sexually active Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte and Miranda are all represented as incredibly independent career focused females. With Miranda being a lawyer, Samantha a manager and Carrie as a writer. A women’s role is historically seen as a housewife whilst they depend on their husbands the breadwinners. However this began to change during the Second World War where “men were called up to serve in the forces, women took over the jobs traditionally done by men.”[14] Following this, women began to rebel and demanded for equal rights within education and the workforce. Other texts such as ‘Charlie’s Angels’ (1976) also represent females as powerful and fending for themselves on the other hand still subordinate to men as they work for a man and take instructions from ‘Charlie’ as he says at the beginning, “once upon a time, there were three little girls who went to the police academy, but I took them all away and now they work for me. My name is Charlie”.[15] Radical feminist’s could suggest the ‘Angels’ are almost seen as slaves to ‘Charlie’. This reinforces patriarchal ideologies as although it may seem they are fighting criminals and becoming superior to men they are actually still below them. ‘Sex and the City’ completely contradicts this portrayal as all four characters are in successful jobs and are able to live the “American Dream of success, fame and wealth through thrift and hard work.”[16] “Women with money and women in power are two uncomfortable ideas in our society”[17] as these were unheard of in the past, therefore ‘Sex and the City’s’ representation of independent women attempts to relieve this uncomfortable ideology from society.

The way in which the four female characters of sex and the city have been represented can be seen as an overtly feminist approach however it can also be argued that it is betraying the idea of feminism altogether. Although “the women live sexually liberated lives, they’re nevertheless forever in search of the perfect man to fulfil their emotional needs.”[18] The movie “displays a singular obsession for men”[19] which can show their weakness as they are in need of a man in their lives for happiness. This reinforces the historical representation of women who were once dependant on men for money and happiness. On the other hand the girls are shown to be ‘checking out’ younger men as they walk down the street together even though they are all in relationships, which can show that they possess male traits which shows gender division is increasingly egalitarian.

Mulvey quotes that female characters hold an "appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact"[20] to attract male audiences, this is known as the ‘male gaze’ and Jonathon Schroeder also notes that “film has been called an instrument of the male gaze, producing representations of women, the good life, and sexual fantasy from a male point of view”[21]. The male gaze is evident in films such as ‘Die Another Day’ (2002), ‘Tomb Raider’ (2001) and more historical texts such as ‘Some Like It Hot’ (1959) in which the women are merely there “to-be-looked-at-ness”[22]. ‘Tomb Raider starring Angelina Jolie represents an incredibly dominating female character however it can be argued that she is being presented as a sexual object carrying a phallic symbol rather than a powerful women carrying a firearm. Similarly ‘Die Another Day’ has a slow motion scene of Halle Barry coming out of the sea in an orange bikini, it is evident that this was not a part of the narrative however was still used.

The ‘gals’ of ‘Sex and the City’ aren’t seen as objects of the male gaze. “The cinematic apparatus legitimates and perpetuates a patriarchal order in which the object of the look is female and the subject of the look is male.”[23] however this ideology is subverted as there are many scenes throughout the film where the male characters takes on the passive role of being looked at while the women do the ‘looking’. The ‘female gaze’ is particularly applied to a scene where Samantha is sitting on her balcony staring at the man next door, the audience are also put in her position so they are able to receive the sexual pleasure she is receiving. Samantha later goes on to say “What’s the point in having a hot guy next door if you cant have sex with him”[24] which isn’t a way in which women have been previously represented. Although the male gaze isn’t applied in the film itself, the issue of its existence is brought to attention threw Miranda and Carrie going shopping for a costume and Miranda saying “the only two choices for women, witch or sexy kitten” and Carrie replying “you just said a mouth full there sister”[25].

Historically, “within certain limits, aggressive male behaviour is accepted as a normal part of everyday life.”[26] For many years this was the only representation of men reflected in the media for example in texts such as ‘The Firm’ (1988). As a result of this representation of men, women would always be shown as feeble, naïve and uneducated. More recently there has been the arrival of the ‘new man’. The new man is a male character who has adopted female characteristics. The male characters in ‘Sex and the City’ have all been portrayed as the new man as they are all emotional and care very much about there appearance, this results in the female characters of ‘Sex and the City’ automatically being represented as more powerful and dominating as the male characters are seen as a lot less aggressive. There has almost completely been a reverse in gender roles. Although the male protagonist reflects the new man, there has still been some authority left in him as he is called “Mr BIG”. This could suggest the size of his penis or his importance in general throughout the film.

The character of “Charlotte, [is] in her comfortable domestic mothering role [and] finds herself pregnant and gives birth”[27]. Charlotte conforms most to the stereotypical passive housewife. Like men, most “women too were focused more on goals like college degrees, entrepreneurship and home ownership than on matrimony”[28]. However marriage and creating a family and becoming a mother of a child is the most important for charlotte. Carrying out a ‘dual shift’ is almost seen as a norm. Thus resulting in ‘Sex and the City’ creating a very traditional anti feminist representation of one of the female protagonists in the film. This suggests that traditional representations of women have not been entirely abolished as she is being represented as the “Madonna”

Samantha is a 47 year old woman represented as an anti marriage woman who doesn’t want any emotional commitment, her only aim it to satisfy her sexual desires. “I’m not the kind of women that sits at home all day waiting for a man”[29], “I cant believe I’ve let my life revolve around a man, on what planet did I let that happen”[30], “you know me I don’t really believe in marriage now botox on the other hand works every time.”[31] In the past women have lived to get married and have a family however Samantha’s character has rebelled against these traditions as she only cares about herself, her career and her sex life. The 1969 Divorce Act had widened reasons for women to get divorced to their husbands resulting in a phenomenal increase in divorce rates and as an outcome an increase in single independent mothers. At the end of the film she says to her boyfriend “I love you but I love me more”[32] showing the audience that a women can be old, unmarried and enjoy sex without being seen as a disgrace. Samantha is represented as the “whore”. “I don’t think there’s ever been a women who has expressed so much sexual joy without her getting punished”[33], this is quoted by Kim Cattrall who plays the character of Samantha.

Miranda is represented as strong as she leaves her husband after finding out he was unfaithful however “the fact that he had an affair was almost accepted of him because he is a man. People told Miranda she made a huge mistake by leaving Steve, completely ignoring the fact that he was unfaithful ”[34] this then weakened Miranda and conveyed her as less able to live without him resulting in her eventually forgiving him. This shows her as feeble and represents Steve as more potent.

After 10 years Carrie decided to get married to Big, the fact that she decided to get married after 10 years shows that getting married wasn’t one of her priorities in life as it would have been for a women in the past. When Big didn’t turn up on the wedding day Carrie was shown as heart broken and upset, she was now nothing without a male figure in her life, her representation of independent was now meaning less as her life had fallen apart due to a man. Big was represented as powerful as he had the strength to destroy such a strong headed woman. Carrie isn’t represented as traditional housewife, this is apparent as she says “he also says the kitchen need’s doing, of course I don’t know that because I keep sweaters on my stove”.[35]

In the late 1990’s Spice Girls introduced the idea of ‘Girl Power’ which resulted in the unity of girls and female friendships whereas it was once only about women’s husbands and children. The film “doesn't revolve around men so much as female friendship. Crises over men come and go, along with the ups and downs of life, but their four-way friendship remains.”[36] The women are represented as sensitive and caring between one another, friendship is an extremely important factor in their lives and nothing can come between it. This hasn’t been shown in many previous media texts as women where never given the chance to bond with each other.
“Almost every girl has someone whom she admires and idolizes, whether it’s a family member, a fictional character, or a celebrity.”[37] The characters of ‘Sex and the City’ give every woman someone to identify with or aspire to be like. The audience will use the film as a form of escapism as well as personal identification. The ‘Sex and the City’ girls are represented as goddesses to their female audiences through there designer labels and sexual attractiveness. As a result the film has become “more powerful then any fashion magazine or nightlife guide”[38]. The hypodermic syringe model suggests that “based on the assumed ‘passive’ nature of a mass audience, the theory argues that consumption of media texts is like the injection of a drug and that the audiences behaviour and opinions are therefore directly affected”[39]. The film conforms to this model as it injects the idea that women need to act a certain way, have a particular physique and carry designer labels in order to be successful in life. The ‘gals’ have a “fascination with consumer objects; because of their power to signify as sign of luxury, social power and sexual attractiveness”[40]

Women were once represented as passive, well mannered and polite for example in ‘The Colour Purple’ (1985). This has been subverted in Sex and the City as the ‘gals’ will resort to abusive and vulgar language. Women were never shown to disrespect or speak rudely to men however when Samantha needs to get a point across she will say things such as “fifty fucking thousand” and “hey dikwod I’m fucking speaking”[41]. Throughout the film the female characters used offensive language but the male characters were represented as civil and courteous.

More recent films such as ‘Mr and Mrs Smith’ (2005) are portraying men and women as entirely equal when it comes to representing them as part of a work force. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are both up against each other as they both are deviously working as secret agents. However their stereotypes within the films are still highlighted as Angelina Jolie would say things such as “honey what would you like for dinner”[42] and she would hide her weapons in the oven where as Brad Pitt would hide his weapons in the garage.


So, how do the representations of women in ‘Sex and the City’: The movie, differ from previous representations of women and why have these changes occurred?
The changes in the media reflect the ‘zeitgeist’ therefore the changes between previous media texts and Sex and the City had occurred due to changes in society. “Film reflects society and vice versa and in doing so reflects the ideological and social construction of women who are either to be revered (as the virgin) or reviled (as the whore).”[43] The four female characters are represented as strong independent women that can fend for themselves and treat themselves to designer labels and vacations. Although they are shown to have high ranking jobs this is an unrealistic representation of women in society as men still succeed more than women in the job market. However it is clear that the representation of independent women in Sex and the City today differs greatly to women that were once simply represented as housewives and caring mothers.

Furthermore, the women of Sex and the City are extremely sexually active, these representations have occurred due to the arrival of the contraceptive pill as women could enjoy sex as regularly as men without worrying about getting pregnant. The representation in sex in the city of sex obsessed women differs greatly from previously represented women as they were once only on screen for simply the sexual pleasures of men however they are now on screen expressing their own sexual desires. It was once forbidden for a woman to sexually express themselves as the characters of sex and the city do however it is now accepted and also admired by many female audiences.

Previously women were represented as either an object of the male gaze or a passive housewife, prior to that women on the whole were completely rejected from the media. In films such as ‘The Good, The Bad and the Ugly’ (1966) there was no sign of any female characters only aggressive male protagonist, from this it is evident that representations have drastically changed as Sex and the City is now a film which consists of four female protagonists an it is “unusual to see a film that features women as the leading characters of their own lives.”

Although it is clear that representations of women have been progressing over the years, from women being once symbolically annihilated from the media, then being conveyed as housewife, which then lead to women being represented as an object of the male gaze which reinforced the “degrading and trivialising views of women”[44], it was then followed by similar representations to women in sex and the city where women are independent and sexually active, it can also still be seen that the women still rely vastly on love from men and also crave attention from males which suggests that even films such as ‘Sex and the City’ withhold traditional representations of women which is particularly shown threw the character of Charlotte as well as Miranda and Carrie who end up "happily paired up" with a man. The only character who consistently subverts traditional representations is the character of Samantha who leaves her boyfriend at the end of the film as she feels she loves herself more than anyone else. Overall, the representations of women in Sex and the City differ hugely from past representations however it is apparent that traditional values and ideologies still pay a substantial role within the representations of women in ‘Sex and the City’: The movie.
[1] Sex and the City: The movie.
[2] Sex and the City: Kiss and Tell: Sohn,Amy (2002) Pg 24
[3] Tuchman, Gaye (1978)
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Mulvey
5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_girl
6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_girl
7 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_girl

[8] Gauntlett, david (2002) “ Media, Gender and Identity” page48
[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_contraceptive#Effects_on_sexuality
9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_contraceptive#Effects_on_sexuality
10 Sex and the City: The movie (2008)11 Representations of Gender Today: Gauntlett, David p60
12 Sex and the City: The movie
13 http://www.historyonthenet.com/WW2/home_front.htm#Women




[15] http://www.tv.com/charlie-s-angels/show/559/summary.html
15http://www.americansc.org.uk/Online/American_Dream.htm
16 http://www.feministing.com/archives/004026.html
17 http://feministreview.blogspot.com/2008/06/sex-and-city-movie.html

18 The guardian newspaper




[20] Mulvey,Laura (1975)
20 Schroeder , Jonathon
21 Mulvey,Laura (1975)
22 Kellner, Douglas: p.387
23 Sex and the City: The movie (2008)



24 Sex and the City: The movie (2008)
25 Lewis G 1983 pg 11
26http://feministreview.blogspot.com/2008/06/sex-and-city-movie.html
27 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,997804-4,00.html





[29] Sex and the City: The movie (2008)
[30] Sex and the City: The movie (2008)
[31] Sex and the City: The movie (2008)
[32] Sex and the City: The movie (2008)
32 The guardian news
33http://community.feministing.com/2008/08/my_problem_with_sex_and_the_ci.html


[35] Sex and the City: The movie (2008)
[36] http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/04/17/satc/

[37] http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6611/madonnas_impact_on_society.html
[38] Sex and the city: Kiss and Tell: Sohn, Amy (2002) P158
[39] Allan , Philip Essential Word Dictionary pg 77
[40] Bignell, Jonathon (2004) pg 216
[41] Sex and the City: The movie (2008)
[42] Mr and Mrs Smith’ (2005)
[43] Hayward , Susan pg 113-114
[44] Dyer , Gillian (1987)

TARGETS FOR INDP STUDY

- ADD MORE SHEP

- MORE AUDIENCE THEORY

- EXPAND ON POINTS

- MORE AUTHORTIVE QUOTES NOT FROM WIKI, BOOKS!

- COMPARE TO MORE TEXTS

Movie Franchisee stufff

Scary Movie: References to other horror movies

-Scream
-I know what you did last summer
- Halloween
- Sixth Sense
-The Blair Witch Project
-The Matrix
-The Usual Suspects

Scream : References to other horror movies:

- A nightmare on elm street
- Halloween
- Psycho
- Night of the living dead
- Stab
- The town that dreaded sundown
- The Texas Chainsaw Massacre

Pastiche – Postmodern playwriting technique that fuses a variety of styles, genres and story lines to create a new form. – this is relevant to scream as the director has used different movies of different genres and embedded into scream for example ‘ A nightmare on elm street’ as its a SciFi.

Irony – an outcome of events that is the opposite of what was or might have been expected- This is relevant to scream as it is ironic how the teenagers themselves know the typical conventions of slasher films however they still manage to become a frightened victim of one.

Intertextuality - this is the shaping of texts meanings by other texts it can refer to an authors borrowing and transformation of a prior text.- This is relevant as the film itself makes reference to other films such as A Nightmare on Elmstreet and Halloween.

Scream Franchise:


Scream – 1966 – Directed by Wes Craven who also directed A nightmare on elmstreet.
It revitalized the Slasher film genre in the mid 1990’s.
The two main films which are referred to throughout the film are Halloween and Nightmare on elm street.
Scream was one of the highest grossing films of 1996
A signature device, started in Scream and continued in Scream 2 and Scream 3, was the typical "rules" for the slasher subgenre of horror movies being stated by the characters. These were known as:

You may not survive the movie if you have sex.
You may not survive the movie if you drink or do drugs.
You may not survive the movie if you say "I'll be right back","Hello?" or "Who's there?"
Scream has two sequels, Scream 2 and Scream 3. A fourth film was announced by The Weinstein Company in July 2008.

Scream (1996):
Scream 2 (1997):
Scream 3 (1999):



Friday 13th Franchise

Friday the 13th is an American horror franchise that consists of twelve slasher films, a television show, novels, comic books, and tie-in merchandise.

The franchise mainly focuses on the fictional character of Jason Voorhees, who drowned at Camp Crystal Lake as a boy due to the negligence of the teenage counselors.

Jason is featured in all of the films, either as the killer or as the motivation for the killings. The original film was written by Victor Miller, and was produced and directed by Sean S. Cunningham; neither returned to write or direct any of the sequels.
The original film was created to cash in on the success of John Carpenter's Halloween (1978), and its own success led Paramount Pictures to purchase the full licensing rights to the Friday the 13th franchise.

four films were adapted into novels, with Friday the 13th Part III adapted by two separate authors. When the franchise was sold to New Line Cinema, Cunningham returned as a producer to oversee two additional films, as well as the crossover film with Freddy Krueger from the Nightmare on Elm Street film series

Friday the 13th is considered one of the most successful media franchises in America—not only for the success of the films, but also because of the extensive merchandising and repeated references to the series in popular culture

The franchise’s popularity has generated a fanbase who have created their own Friday the 13th films


Halloween:UK


- The remake of halloween that I intend on releasing will keep many aspects of the other halloween film however it will also change some.

- It will keep the final girls as women in society are becoming more powerful and independent and have more authority, the majority of the victims will be men to emphasize the change of roles in society.

- I will also change the sound and make it more upbeat to add to the effect of the killings in order to make the audience react more and make it more of a physical reaction.

- I will show less shots from the killers point of view and instead have it from the victims point of view as it creates more of an impact on the audience as they feel more tense and on edge as they don’t now know when ‘they’ are going to be attacked.

- The killer will still be a man as it shows that even though women are more independent men are still the more violent brutal murderers where as women are kind and caring which is how the two are portrayed in society.

- I will add more of a twist to the storyline to confuse the audience and let them become engaged as they could loose interest as they will have generic expectations of the movie therefore I will change those expectations.

- I will keep the look the same as the audience will be able to recognise the killer from the previous sequels.





A Nightmare On Elm Street Franchise:

- A Nightmare on Elm Street is an American horror franchise that consists of eight slasher films, a television show, novels, and comic books. The franchise began with the film series, which was created by Wes Craven, with various other individuals taking over those jobs for each film sequel.

- The franchise is based on the fictional character of Freddy Krueger, introduced in A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), who stalks and kills teenagers in their dreams; if Freddy kills the teenager in the dream world then they are ultimately killed in the real world.

- The original film was written and directed by Craven, who returned to co-script the second sequel, A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987), and to write and direct New Nightmare (1994).

- The original film was released in 1984, and following it a series of sequels was produced by the independent film company New Line Cinema. New Line often attributes the growth of their company to the success of the Nightmare franchise.

- A Nightmare on Elm Street is the third highest grossing franchise

Scary Movie Franchise

- The Scary Movie series is a series of films which mainly specialize in spoofing current, popular horror films

- The two main recurring actors of the series are Anna Faris and Regina Hall, as Cindy Campbell and Brenda Meeks, respectively. They are joined by new or recurring actors and characters.

- They were distributed by Dimension Films through two different studios: Miramax Films, as it was originally the studio's genre film label during executive producers Bob Weinstein and Harvey Weinstein's run and produced the first three films, and The Weinstein Company, the brothers' newly formed studio, which currently produces the rest of the series' release after departing from Miramax and taking the Dimension Films label with them.

- Scary Movie 2 (July 6, 2001) is the second in franchise. In the U.S., the film grossed $71,308,997. Worldwide, it grossed $141,220,678. Although being a hit, out of the four Scary Movie films, this is the least successful to dat.

- Scary Movie 3 (October 24, 2003) is the third film in the series. With $220,673,217 worldwide, it is second most successful/popular film in the series. The plot of the film is a spoof combination of The Ring and Signs with other film/celebrity spoofs thrown in.

Esssay

Similarities And Differences

Similarities:


They both have a final girl
Both stories are set in 1970’s
Issues and debates such as, captialism, canniblaism, is emphasised.
Both follow todorovs theory

Differences

In first one sally the final girl is shown as a bimbo
In the second one erin the final girl is shown as a heroine as she is shown to be hot wiring a car.
The new one is not censored
The ending is very different

Texas Chainsaw Massacre Essay:

Both The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (2003) are b from the slasher genre and follow the same generic convention such as the final girl and the stereotypical male killer.

As both the films have been produced in different eras the audience’s will vary and therefore there expectations of the films will also be different. The 1974 Texas chainsaw massacre will appeal to a target audience of 15-20 teenagers however the new one could appeal to an older audience as well as teenagers as the older audience may want to watch the remake as they have seen the 1974 version. The 1974 Texas Chainsaw massacre was censored therefore the audiences reaction to the film will differ hugely to the 2003 Texas chainsaw massacre as that one is a a lot more gruesome and creates more of a visceral reaction as the shots and sounds they use in the 2003 TCM are a lot more effective.

The narrative of the two Texas Chainsaw Massacre are also very different, the beginning of Texas Chainsaw Massacre the five friends pick up a crazy ,male hitchicker who slits his arm with a knife however the 2003 Texas chainsaw massacre opening is of 5 friends that pick up a female hitchicker but instead of slitting her wrists she shoots herself, this refelect’s society as gun crime is increasing.

The final girl must follow a theory of sex equals death. This theory is applied in the 2003 TCM as the couple die as they have had sex.There is a visible final girl in both 1974 TCM and 2003 TCM, this gives the idea that they are seen to be more superior to males as they are the ones who survive. This goes against the stereotypical women that are often portrayed on other films. The ‘final girl’ is a character used in many slasher films.

Todorov narrative theory is applied to both of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre films, the equilibrium is where everything is calm and exciting with the 5 friends, the disequilibrium occurs when the killing begin and the resolution can be showed through the final girl survivng the killer.

The ending of the films is also different in some aspects, at the end of the first film the character relies on someone else to give her a lift back to safety, in the new film the final girl makes her own way back home by steeling the police car and then driving away, even though it may seem irrelevant, the way the film ends is important in terms of female representation.The female character made her own way home this shows the movements of females and that they have the ability to be independent by helping herself it reflects the way women are in today’s society.

Over all both the 1974 and 2003 Texas Chanisaw Massacre share many of the same aspects however also have differences.